The University of North Carolina at Charlotte
 
The Performance Management Process
 
 
Use the navigation bar above to explore our website. Using the mouse, roll over a functional unit title to view links to those areas.

The Performance Management Cycle / Process

- The current Performance Management Cycle begins March 1, 2007 and ends February 29, 2008. This is defined by the State of North Carolina.

- Interim Reviews should be conducted between September 17 and October 17, 2007.

- Interim Review documents (if any) need not be submitted to Human Resources upon completion, however, attach any documents to the Annual Appraisal / PCAC form when submitting the Annual Appraisal at the end of the Performance Cycle.

- The Annual Appraisal must be completed and submitted with all appropriate signatures (employee, supervisor, AND reviewer) to Human Resources no later than Friday, April 25, 2008.

Obtain blank forms here:
Performance Management, Competency Assessment, and Career Development form
- aka the New Performance Management (PCAC) form
- for establishing the work plan - for both Career-Banded and non Career-Banded positions


Interim Review Improvement Plan

Annual Appraisal (to be used for non career-banded positions unless a PCAC form has been established for it)

Questions regarding the Performance Management Process may be referred to:
Kathy Helvey, Classification and Compensation, x 7-2010
Shirley Greene Jackson, Employee Training and Staff Development, x 7-2636
Cindy Edwards, Employee Relations, x 7-6015

UNC Charlotte's Legal Policy Statement #54 mandates the use of the State's Performance Management system and outlines the process of managing employee performance. "The work performance of all permanent employees subject to the provisions of the State Personnel Act ("classified" or "SPA" employees) will be appraised at least annually by the immediate supervisor of the employee and reviewed by a higher level supervisor, as appropriate. The appraisal of employee performance is to be job related and not influenced by gender, ethnic category, religion, physical or mental handicap, or age (as provided by law)." - Excerpt from first paragraph of PS #54

There are three phases to the Performance Management Process

- Work Planning (Development of Work plan)
- Managing (Interim Review & Interaction Management)
- Appraising (Completion of Appraisal)

1. Work Planning
Developing the Work Plan

Upon hiring an employee into a position, the Performance Management Process begins with the development of an employee's work plan. To begin, download the "Performance Management, Competency Assessment, and Career Development" (PCAC) form from the HR forms website. If the position you supervise is NOT career-banded, complete only the first two columns in Section III. Performance Management Work Plan and Final Results Performance Evaluation.
(Note: Prior to September 15, 2006, this would have been submitted on a "work plan" form. At this time, please use the PCAC form for establishing the work plan and all further performance cycle documentation. We are currently transitioning all employees to this new form for Performance Management.)

If the position you supervise is career-banded, complete the first two columns in Section III and the first two columns in Section IV. Functional Competency Assessment, which establishes expectations to assess the employee's functional competency development. (Section IV is not part of the Perfomance Management Process, however, completion of Section IV coincides with the Performance Management Cycle.)

To complete the first two columns of Section III, review the current job description and transfer each Key Responsibility from the job description onto this form, ranking appropriately. For each Key Responsibility listed, develop expectations / measurable goals for the employee to attain. Do not restate the tasks of the job, develop measurable standards to achieve. The expectations listed should be written at the '3 - good - meets expectations' level of performance. Use S.M.A.R.T. criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results oriented, Time-bound) Consult the following "Guide to developing Performance Expectations" for assistance in setting up Section III.

After setting up Section III and developing performance expectations in conjunction with your employee, discussing the information with him/her, obtain appropriate signatures on the first page of the PCAC form under "Initial Work Planning Discussion" and submit a copy to Human Resources for placement in the employee's personnel file. Be sure to retain your electronic copy of the PCAC form, as it is to be used continually throughout the Performance Management cycle.

2. Managing
Interim Review

The Interim Review is a time for all SPA employees to receive semi-annual interim performance counseling. This counseling opportunity is intended for supervisors to discuss performance with SPA employees and, if necessary, develop plans for correcting problems during the second half of the annual performance cycle, before official performance reviews are to be conducted and finalized at the end of the current Performance Cycle.

The Interim Review is to occur during September and October (6 months into the work cycle). Review the work plan / PCAC with SPA employees and develop an improvement plan if needed. There is an "Interim Review Improvement Plan" on the HR forms webpage if you choose to utilize it. Interim Reviews need not be submitted to Human Resources, as is required with annual Performance Appraisals, however, if an Interim Review Improvement Plan is completed at this time, it must be attached to and submitted with the annual appraisal at the end of the performance cycle.

For Career-Banded positions, the Interim Review time can also be used for discussing the employee’s competency development, to prepare the employee for his/her end of cycle Competency Assessment, which is required in conjunction with the Annual Performance Appraisal.

3. Appraising
Completion of Appraisal

Initiate the annual Appraisal/Review process at the beginning of March by reviewing the employee's PCAC form / work plan. If using a PCAC form, complete your appraisal of the employee by providing justification and a performance rating in the two columns on the right of Section III, "Final Demonstrated Performance Results" and "Final Performance Rating".

In order to finalize an Annual Appraisal, three items are required:
     - The overall performance rating must be scored on the cover (first) page of the PCAC form
     - The supervisor is required to provide comments at the end of Section III in the space provided
     - The Annual Appraisal must contain the employee's, the supervisor's, and the reviewer's signature, otherwise it will be returned

Remember, the performance appraisal covers the entire time period of March 1 - February 28, not just the last few weeks or months before the end of the appraisal period. Changes in management, procedures, responsibilities, etc., may have resulted in a change in the performance expectations. A glowing review during the previous period does not necessarily mean the employee is still performing at that level. In addition, a change from a rating of "4" to a rating of "3" does not necessairly indicate the employee is a poor performer. A rating of "3" means the person is adequately performing their job responsibilities, thus meeting expectations. In considering a higher rating, supervisors need to consider what the employee is doing or contributing that elevates their performance and document how the employee is exceeding expectations.

Provide a copy of the evaluation to the employee, keep a copy for your records, and submit the original to Human Resources.

Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Do Interim and Annual performance reviews apply to both (FLSA) exempt and non-exempt employees?
A: Yes, all employees considered as SPA (Subject to the State Personnel Act) must be reviewed through this process. The Fair Labor Standards Act classification, exempt versus non-exempt, does not apply to Performance Management requirements.
Q: My employee is still completing his/her Probationary period. Must I complete a Performance Evaluation for him/her?
A: You are not required to at this time, but you may choose to do so. At the end of the probationary period, you will complete a "Probationary Performance Review" form that will serve as the Performance Appraisal on file for the cycle.
Q: My employee is performing low and has for some time now. We discussed his/her low performance during the Interim Review, but his/her performance has not rebounded. I want him/her to be eligible for the legislative increase, assuming there is one this year. (At this point, it is unknown if the State Legislature is planning to enact a legislative increase for SPA employees.) Should I still give my employee a rating of "Very Good (4)"?
A: The Performance Management Cycle will be undermined if you choose to rate him/her at the "Very Good (4)" level. Poor performance must be documented in order to correct his/her behavior. By rating the employee at the "Very Good (4)" level, you are telling him/her that you approve of his/her low performance. In addition, should it become necessary to begin a formal disciplinary action against your employee, this process will be more difficult if he/she has received a rating of "Very Good" on the evaluation.
Q: I have much more important work to do than sit down with my well performing employee and discuss this. Why should I take precious time out of my day to do this?
A: We all have work that is very important to do. However, the Performance Appraisal, as well as being a tool for documenting performance, should also be a time used for communicating with your employee about his/her work style, work ethic, and overall mood. Also, employees who do not receive regular feedback concerning their positive performance are more likely to become disgruntled due to lack of appreciation. The annual performance process gives you an opportunity to tell those employees how much their contributions are valued.
Q: I have an employee who performs his/her tasks well. However, his/her overall demeanor and personality while performing these tasks are horrible. This employee brings other employee's spirits down by the way he/she handles interactions with others. How do I handle this because the work plan (thus the Performance Evaluation) is written to reflect the tasks that need to be performed and do not address behavioral issues?
A: Establishing a work plan using Dimensions or Behavioral Competencies, instead of Key Responsibilities, can greatly assist in this situation. Dimensions and Behavioral Competencies, items such as "Service Orientation", "Teamwork/Collaboration with others", "Communication Skills", etc., should be written into the work plan, with examples of poor, good, and above average expectations, to give your employee a basis. To better understand Dimensions, and view an expanded list of dimensions, visit the Dictionary of Dimensions on the Office of State Personnel's web page.
Q: What can an employee do if he/she is dissatisfied with his/her Performance Appraisal rating?

A: Employees are encouraged to discuss their ratings with their immediate supervisor in an attempt to resolve discrepancies in the supervisor's expectations and the employee's performance. An employee may also elect to review the performance ratings and their concerns with the reviewing official (the reviewer's supervisor). Another option an employee has is to submit a statement to be attached to his/her appraisal stating the rating they disagree with and why. Employees may grieve overall performance ratings of "Good (3)" or below. Employees may not grieve ratings on each individual primary job responsibility or dimension, just the overall performance rating.
Q: I have an employee who has transferred to another department. Why am I being asked to do the performance appraisal?
A: Since the appraisal period spans twelve months, it is appropriate for the person who supervised an employee the longest during the appraisal period to prepare the performance appraisal. The appraisal should be sent to the former employee for their review/comments and signature, then returned to the former supervisor for final review and signature. A copy of the appraisal should be sent to the employee for their records, a copy may be kept in the former department, and the original must be sent to the Human Resources Department.
The current supervisor of the employee may also complete an appraisal for the new position but often the employee is not yet performing all responsibilities of the new position so it may be difficult to get the best picture of the employee's long term performance. Having input from the previous supervisor helps give accurate feedback that can be beneficial for both the employee and new supervisor.

Questions or Suggestions about the website?

 
 
 

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Human Resources
9201 University City Boulevard
Charlotte, NC  28223-0001
704-687-2276