| |
Use
the navigation bar above to explore our website. Using
the mouse, roll over a functional unit title to view
links to those areas. |
The Performance Management
Cycle / Process
|
-
The current Performance Management Cycle begins
March 1, 2007 and ends February
29, 2008. This is defined by the State
of North Carolina.
-
Interim Reviews should be conducted between
September 17 and October
17, 2007.
-
Interim Review documents (if any) need not be
submitted to Human Resources upon completion,
however, attach any documents to the Annual Appraisal
/ PCAC form when submitting the Annual Appraisal
at the end of the Performance Cycle.
-
The Annual Appraisal must be completed and submitted
with all appropriate signatures (employee,
supervisor, AND reviewer) to Human Resources
no later than Friday, April 25, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Questions
regarding the Performance Management Process may
be referred to:
Kathy Helvey,
Classification and Compensation, x 7-2010
Shirley Greene Jackson, Employee
Training and Staff Development, x 7-2636
Cindy Edwards, Employee Relations,
x 7-6015
UNC
Charlotte's Legal
Policy Statement #54 mandates the use of the
State's Performance Management system and outlines
the process of managing employee performance.
"The work performance of all permanent employees
subject to the provisions of the State Personnel
Act ("classified" or "SPA"
employees) will be appraised at least annually
by the immediate supervisor of the employee and
reviewed by a higher level supervisor, as appropriate.
The appraisal of employee performance is to be
job related and not influenced by gender, ethnic
category, religion, physical or mental handicap,
or age (as provided by law)." - Excerpt from
first paragraph of PS #54 |
|
There
are three phases to the Performance Management
Process
-
Work Planning (Development of
Work plan)
- Managing (Interim Review &
Interaction Management)
- Appraising (Completion of Appraisal) |
|
1.
Work Planning
Developing the Work Plan
Upon
hiring an employee into a position, the Performance
Management Process begins with the development
of an employee's work plan. To begin, download
the "Performance Management, Competency
Assessment, and Career Development"
(PCAC) form from the HR
forms website. If the position you supervise
is NOT career-banded, complete
only the first two columns in
Section III. Performance Management
Work Plan and Final Results Performance Evaluation.
(Note: Prior to September 15, 2006, this would
have been submitted on a "work plan"
form. At this time, please use the PCAC form for
establishing the work plan and all further performance
cycle documentation. We are currently transitioning
all employees to this new form for Performance
Management.)
If
the position you supervise is career-banded,
complete the first two columns in Section III
and the first two columns in
Section IV. Functional Competency
Assessment, which establishes expectations
to assess the employee's functional competency
development. (Section IV is not part of the
Perfomance Management Process, however, completion
of Section IV coincides with the Performance Management
Cycle.)
To
complete the first two columns of Section III,
review the current job description and transfer
each Key Responsibility from the job description
onto this form, ranking appropriately. For each
Key Responsibility listed, develop expectations
/ measurable goals for the employee to attain.
Do not restate the tasks of the job, develop measurable
standards to achieve. The expectations listed
should be written at the '3 - good - meets expectations'
level of performance. Use S.M.A.R.T.
criteria (Specific,
Measurable,
Achievable,
Results
oriented, Time-bound)
Consult the following "Guide
to developing Performance Expectations"
for assistance in setting up Section III.
After
setting up Section III and developing performance
expectations in conjunction with your employee,
discussing the information with him/her, obtain
appropriate signatures on the first page of the
PCAC form under "Initial Work Planning Discussion"
and submit a copy to Human Resources for placement
in the employee's personnel file. Be sure
to retain your electronic copy of the PCAC form,
as it is to be used continually throughout the
Performance Management cycle. |
|
2.
Managing
Interim Review
The
Interim Review is a time for all SPA employees
to receive semi-annual interim performance counseling.
This counseling opportunity is intended for supervisors
to discuss performance with SPA employees and,
if necessary, develop plans for correcting problems
during the second half of the annual performance
cycle, before official performance reviews are
to be conducted and finalized at the end of the
current Performance Cycle.
The
Interim Review is to occur during September and
October (6 months into the work cycle). Review
the work plan / PCAC with SPA employees and develop
an improvement plan if needed. There is an "Interim
Review Improvement Plan" on the HR
forms webpage if you choose to utilize it.
Interim Reviews need not be submitted to Human
Resources, as is required with annual Performance
Appraisals, however, if an Interim Review Improvement
Plan is completed at this time, it must be attached
to and submitted with the annual appraisal at
the end of the performance cycle.
For
Career-Banded positions, the Interim Review time
can also be used for discussing the employee’s
competency development, to prepare the employee
for his/her end of cycle Competency Assessment,
which is required in conjunction with the Annual
Performance Appraisal. |
|
3.
Appraising
Completion
of Appraisal
Initiate
the annual Appraisal/Review process at the beginning
of March by reviewing the employee's PCAC form
/ work plan. If using a PCAC form, complete your
appraisal of the employee by providing justification
and a performance rating in the two columns on
the right of Section III, "Final
Demonstrated Performance Results"
and "Final Performance Rating".
In
order to finalize an Annual Appraisal, three items
are required:
-
The overall performance rating must be scored
on the cover (first) page of the PCAC form
- The supervisor is required to provide comments
at the end of Section III in the space provided
- The Annual Appraisal
must contain the employee's, the supervisor's,
and the reviewer's signature,
otherwise it will be returned
Remember,
the performance appraisal covers the entire time
period of March 1 - February 28, not just the
last few weeks or months before the end of the
appraisal period. Changes in management, procedures,
responsibilities, etc., may have resulted in a
change in the performance expectations. A glowing
review during the previous period does not necessarily
mean the employee is still performing at that
level. In addition, a change from a rating of
"4" to a rating of "3" does
not necessairly indicate the employee is a poor
performer. A rating of "3" means the
person is adequately performing their job responsibilities,
thus meeting expectations. In considering a higher
rating, supervisors need to consider what the
employee is doing or contributing that elevates
their performance and document how the employee
is exceeding expectations.
Provide
a copy of the evaluation to the employee, keep
a copy for your records, and submit the original
to Human Resources. |
|
Frequently
Asked Questions |
| Q:
Do Interim and Annual performance reviews apply
to both (FLSA) exempt and non-exempt employees? |
|
A:
Yes, all employees considered as SPA (Subject
to the State Personnel Act) must be reviewed through
this process. The Fair Labor Standards Act classification,
exempt versus non-exempt, does not apply to Performance
Management requirements. |
| Q:
My employee is still completing his/her Probationary
period. Must I complete a Performance Evaluation
for him/her? |
|
A:
You are not required to at this time, but you
may choose to do so. At the end of the probationary
period, you will complete a "Probationary
Performance Review" form that will serve
as the Performance Appraisal on file for the cycle. |
| Q:
My employee is performing low and has for some
time now. We discussed his/her low performance
during the Interim Review, but his/her performance
has not rebounded. I want him/her to be eligible
for the legislative increase, assuming there is
one this year. (At this point, it is unknown if
the State Legislature is planning to enact a legislative
increase for SPA employees.) Should I still give
my employee a rating of "Very Good (4)"? |
|
A:
The Performance Management Cycle will be undermined
if you choose to rate him/her at the "Very
Good (4)" level. Poor performance must be
documented in order to correct his/her behavior.
By rating the employee at the "Very Good
(4)" level, you are telling him/her that
you approve of his/her low performance. In addition,
should it become necessary to begin a formal disciplinary
action against your employee, this process will
be more difficult if he/she has received a rating
of "Very Good" on the evaluation. |
| Q:
I have much more important work to do than sit
down with my well performing employee and discuss
this. Why should I take precious time out of my
day to do this? |
|
A:
We all have work that is very important to do.
However, the Performance Appraisal, as well as
being a tool for documenting performance, should
also be a time used for communicating with your
employee about his/her work style, work ethic,
and overall mood. Also, employees who do not receive
regular feedback concerning their positive performance
are more likely to become disgruntled due to lack
of appreciation. The annual performance process
gives you an opportunity to tell those employees
how much their contributions are valued. |
| Q:
I have an employee who performs his/her tasks
well. However, his/her overall demeanor and personality
while performing these tasks are horrible. This
employee brings other employee's spirits down
by the way he/she handles interactions with others.
How do I handle this because the work plan (thus
the Performance Evaluation) is written to reflect
the tasks that need to be performed and do not
address behavioral issues? |
|
A:
Establishing a work plan using Dimensions or Behavioral
Competencies, instead of Key Responsibilities,
can greatly assist in this situation. Dimensions
and Behavioral Competencies, items such as "Service
Orientation", "Teamwork/Collaboration
with others", "Communication Skills",
etc., should be written into the work plan, with
examples of poor, good, and above average expectations,
to give your employee a basis. To better understand
Dimensions, and view an expanded list of dimensions,
visit the Dictionary
of Dimensions on the Office of State Personnel's
web page. |
| Q:
What can an employee do if he/she is dissatisfied
with his/her Performance Appraisal rating? |
|
A:
Employees are encouraged to discuss their ratings
with their immediate supervisor in an attempt
to resolve discrepancies in the supervisor's expectations
and the employee's performance. An employee may
also elect to review the performance ratings and
their concerns with the reviewing official (the
reviewer's supervisor). Another option an employee
has is to submit a statement to be attached to
his/her appraisal stating the rating they disagree
with and why. Employees may grieve overall
performance ratings of "Good (3)" or
below. Employees may not grieve ratings on
each individual primary job responsibility or
dimension, just the overall performance rating. |
| Q:
I have an employee who has transferred to another
department. Why am I being asked to do the performance
appraisal? |
|
A:
Since the appraisal period spans twelve months,
it is appropriate for the person who supervised
an employee the longest during the appraisal period
to prepare the performance appraisal. The appraisal
should be sent to the former employee for their
review/comments and signature, then returned to
the former supervisor for final review and signature.
A copy of the appraisal should be sent to the
employee for their records, a copy may be kept
in the former department, and the original must
be sent to the Human Resources Department.
The current supervisor of the employee may also
complete an appraisal for the new position but
often the employee is not yet performing all responsibilities
of the new position so it may be difficult to
get the best picture of the employee's long term
performance. Having input from the previous supervisor
helps give accurate feedback that can be beneficial
for both the employee and new supervisor. |
|
Questions
or Suggestions about the website?
|